Jump to content

Nominations for Tractor of the Month
Garden Tractors and Parts on eBay



Photo
- - - - -

MF14 and MF16 fender extentions


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 21, 2014 - 11:53 PM

Is there any Massey expert that can answer this? I would like to know if the fender extentions used on the MF 14 and 16 were optional or standard for particular years and models.

 

I have a pretty nice original 1973 MF14. (The engine is currently out and being rebuilt.) Just wondering if this tractor was supposed to have the fender extention. I like the look of the tractor better without them, but I try to keep my tractors original and complete. My 14 does not appear to ever have had them, but should it?

 

MF14 Dec14.jpg


  • Sawdust said thank you

#2 ckjakline OFFLINE  

ckjakline

    Tractorholic

  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 6073
  • 1,080 Thanks
  • 1,094 posts
  • Location: Lititz,Pa

Posted December 22, 2014 - 02:00 AM

The earlier 14's didn't have the extensions.I think it was just the later models.


  • RAJ said thank you

#3 propane1 ONLINE  

propane1
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 54307
  • 6,116 Thanks
  • 3,206 posts
  • Location: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Posted December 22, 2014 - 05:38 AM

75 and 76 MF 14 and 16 had the extensions. Not sure about 74. My friend has a 73 and does not have them. Noel
  • RAJ and Alc have said thanks

#4 IamSherwood OFFLINE  

IamSherwood

    Elf guardian

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 2066
  • 8,379 Thanks
  • 7,696 posts
  • Location: Northern Ontario

Posted December 22, 2014 - 05:53 AM

We've dug in to this subject before, and pretty much came to the

conclusion, that the extensions showed up on the 14s only once the

MF16 came out in 1975 and 76. I've never seen any on older models.

 

Just curious, as I've never looked, but are there bolt holes in the front

of your foot rests? The extensions are held on with 2 bolts there, and

one at the front, that also holds the grill.


  • RAJ, Alc and Sawdust have said thanks

#5 Alc ONLINE  

Alc

    Tractorholic

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 1094
  • 5,459 Thanks
  • 6,629 posts
  • Location: Bangor Pa

Posted December 22, 2014 - 06:35 AM

Would someone post a picture of a tractor with the extensions ?  I would like to see what they look like , thanks Al 



#6 IamSherwood OFFLINE  

IamSherwood

    Elf guardian

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 2066
  • 8,379 Thanks
  • 7,696 posts
  • Location: Northern Ontario

Posted December 22, 2014 - 08:00 AM

This is the only one I have, that really shows the extension well.

 

P1010346.JPG


  • Alc, KennyP and Sawdust have said thanks

#7 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 22, 2014 - 09:32 AM

Thanks. I did not see any bolt holes in the front of my footrests, so I somewhat figured that they were never there. It did look like they would attach to the grille bolts at the front though, so I wanted to be sure. Was there any particular reason for adding them to the 16 and 14 in later years?



#8 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 22, 2014 - 09:34 AM

This is the only one I have, that really shows the extension well.

 

attachicon.gifP1010346.JPG

I always though that the MF14 and 16 were pretty big tractors but that Bush Hog looks huge next to it!



#9 HowardsMF155 OFFLINE  

HowardsMF155

    Tractorholic

  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 4243
  • 2,699 Thanks
  • 2,916 posts
  • Location: Central NC

Posted December 22, 2014 - 10:48 AM

I was thinking the 14 and 16 were the same size as the 10 and 12?  But yes, the Bush Hog is certainly bigger.



#10 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 22, 2014 - 11:17 AM

They don't look to be extremely functional, what was the reason behind having the extentions on later models?



#11 propane1 ONLINE  

propane1
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 54307
  • 6,116 Thanks
  • 3,206 posts
  • Location: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Posted December 22, 2014 - 05:39 PM

Don't know. Makes a great bench when your working on motor parts, place to put tools, parts and your favourite drink. !!!! Noel

Or if you have very long legs, a place for your feet. !!!

Edited by propane1, December 22, 2014 - 05:41 PM.

  • RAJ said thank you

#12 ckjakline OFFLINE  

ckjakline

    Tractorholic

  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 6073
  • 1,080 Thanks
  • 1,094 posts
  • Location: Lititz,Pa

Posted December 22, 2014 - 06:09 PM

I was thinking the 14 and 16 were the same size as the 10 and 12?  But yes, the Bush Hog is certainly bigger.

The 14 and 16 are longer than the 10 and 12.They do have the same nose piece and dash though.



#13 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 22, 2014 - 07:53 PM

I was thinking the 14 and 16 were the same size as the 10 and 12?  But yes, the Bush Hog is certainly bigger.

The 14 and 16 have basically the same design of dash, hood and grille as the rest, but everything else is quite a bit different. That's not to say that the 10s and 12s are any less of a garden tractor. They are also very well built. I've had many MFs and I like them all. I know little about the Bush Hog GTs, but I think the one pictured must be the "super garden tractor" version of Bush Hog for that time which makes even the MF16 look small.



#14 IamSherwood OFFLINE  

IamSherwood

    Elf guardian

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 2066
  • 8,379 Thanks
  • 7,696 posts
  • Location: Northern Ontario

Posted December 22, 2014 - 08:01 PM

They don't look to be extremely functional, what was the reason behind having the extentions on later models?

 

 

Niki Lauda developed them to create some front end down pressure. As you'll see

once you get yours going, they are very fast, and tend to be light in the front end

at high speeds. At the time, Niki was redesigning the Ferrari F1 car, and had access

to the experimental wind tunnel. Had MF not decided to redesign the line completely

in 1976, we could very well have seen a MF16, rather than a Delorean in  "Back to the

Future"

Of course, that is all BS. It's probably all about Bling Bling. :smilewink:


  • RAJ, MH81, KennyP and 1 other said thanks

#15 RAJ OFFLINE  

RAJ

    JMC fan

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 40
  • 302 Thanks
  • 318 posts
  • Location: East-central Minn

Posted December 22, 2014 - 08:05 PM

Niki Lauda developed them to create some front end down pressure. As you'll see

once you get yours going, they are very fast, and tend to be light in the front end

at high speeds. At the time, Niki was redesigning the Ferrari F1 car, and had access

to the experimental wind tunnel. Had MF not decided to redesign the line completely

in 1976, we could very well have seen a MF16, rather than a Delorean in  "Back to the Future"

Of course, that is all BS. It's probably all about Bling Bling. :smilewink:

:rolling:






Top