Jump to content

Nominations for Tractor of the Month
Garden Tractors and Parts on eBay



Photo
- - - - -

Will Someone Go Pick This Up Fer Me?


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 TractorGuy1994 OFFLINE  

TractorGuy1994
  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 39291
  • 259 Thanks
  • 165 posts
  • Location: Greenville NC

Posted July 09, 2013 - 11:14 PM

Mercy i Want this so darn bad! My favorite Year Long bed Rather have the 250 Six but the V8 is fine!

http://cgi.ebay.com/...=item1c34906371

 


  • hamman, MFDAC and Dieselcubmike have said thanks

#2 MFDAC OFFLINE  

MFDAC

    Only member from Western South Dakota!

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Member No: 5815
  • 2,028 Thanks
  • 1,123 posts
  • Location: East of Rapid City, SD in Rapid Valley

Posted July 09, 2013 - 11:30 PM

Yeah that's a sweet truck. I have 2 GMC's from that era. Go out and try to find a late model half ton, two wheel drive pickup with 36,000 miles on it for 6900 bucks. Ain't gonna happen. If I was in the market it would be a truck I would persue!

Later---DAC
  • hamman said thank you

#3 nbent OFFLINE  

nbent

    customizer

  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 8320
  • 628 Thanks
  • 520 posts
  • Location: amalga, UT

Posted July 10, 2013 - 01:19 AM

if it were a little closer or if i had time i would



#4 JDBrian OFFLINE  

JDBrian

    Super Moderator

  • Super Moderator
  • Staff
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 2507
  • 9,574 Thanks
  • 14,136 posts
  • Location: Hubley, Nova Scotia - Canada

Posted July 10, 2013 - 04:23 AM

Very nice! I can see why you want that! 



#5 boyscout862 OFFLINE  

boyscout862
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 8923
  • 9,769 Thanks
  • 7,536 posts
  • Location: N.E. Connecticut

Posted July 10, 2013 - 05:38 AM

Be careful. Those odemeters only went to 99,999 miles, so it could be 136,000 miles. Those were also easy to change. Good Luck, Rick


  • MFDAC and superaben have said thanks

#6 Gtractor OFFLINE  

Gtractor

    The Tractor Hoarder

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 782
  • 6,613 Thanks
  • 3,912 posts
  • Location: Chillicothe, MO

Posted July 10, 2013 - 06:39 AM

The 307 will probably use less fuel than the 250 would.  I used to have a 307 in a '70 Malibu that I tortured and I couldn't make it get less than 16 mpg's.   307's were so much better than the 305's that replaced them. 

VERY NICE pickup!


  • MFDAC, Amigatec and Team_Green have said thanks

#7 Sparky OFFLINE  

Sparky

    Tractorholic

  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 1574
  • 1,295 Thanks
  • 1,892 posts
  • Location: Pa

Posted July 10, 2013 - 06:41 AM

I remember the days - having to mount customer equipment under the seat instead of behind it . Gettting the stuff out for repair was a fun time also . Can anybody say - static display ?  Not being grumpy  - just historical .



#8 Amigatec OFFLINE  

Amigatec

    Collector of Rusty Junk

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 5899
  • 2,023 Thanks
  • 3,172 posts
  • Location: Haskell Oklahoma

Posted July 10, 2013 - 06:52 AM

The 307 will probably use less fuel than the 250 would.  I used to have a 307 in a '70 Malibu that I tortured and I couldn't make it get less than 16 mpg's.   307's were so much better than the 305's that replaced them. 
VERY NICE pickup!


The 307 is a 283 bore and a 327 stroke. Basically a 327 crank in a 283 block. That is why it runs so good the shorter stroke makes it accelerate faster than a 305.

A 305 is a 350 with a smaller bore.
  • Gtractor and MFDAC have said thanks

#9 boyscout862 OFFLINE  

boyscout862
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 8923
  • 9,769 Thanks
  • 7,536 posts
  • Location: N.E. Connecticut

Posted July 10, 2013 - 06:57 AM

Many of the early 307s had problems. I remember in 1971 that there was a rash of them that had to be replaced with less that 40,000 miles. At the same time the newer Volvos were having a rash of engine failures. One of the 60+ year old mechanics I was working with said that the steel had changed and that they weren't ageing the castings. Either way, I have avoided GM engines made 68 to 72 for 40 years.

 

My 73 1500 Suburban with a 350 and three on the tree got 18 mpg on the highway. My 65 Nova Wagon with a 230 and 3 on the tree got 23.7 mpg from CT to CA and back in 1975. Good Luck, Rick


  • Gtractor said thank you

#10 LilysDad OFFLINE  

LilysDad

    Cat Lover

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 10443
  • 9,626 Thanks
  • 7,669 posts
  • Location: N. Illinois, DeKalb County

Posted July 10, 2013 - 07:05 AM

The 307 is a 283 bore and a 327 stroke. Basically a 327 crank in a 283 block. That is why it runs so good the shorter stroke makes it accelerate faster than a 305.

 

The 307 was an early attempt at a smog engine. The 327 was soooo much better.

 

Many of the early 307s had problems. I remember in 1971 that there was a rash of them that had to be replaced with less that 40,000 miles.......the steel had changed and that they weren't ageing the castings. Either way, I have avoided GM engines made 68 to 72 for 40 years.

 

 

In the day, I never heard of such a thing. I must have had a dozen vehicles that never heard of it either!


  • boyscout862 said thank you

#11 LilysDad OFFLINE  

LilysDad

    Cat Lover

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 10443
  • 9,626 Thanks
  • 7,669 posts
  • Location: N. Illinois, DeKalb County

Posted July 10, 2013 - 07:30 AM

Oh, and my personal favorite was the '67.


  • hamman said thank you

#12 boyscout862 OFFLINE  

boyscout862
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 8923
  • 9,769 Thanks
  • 7,536 posts
  • Location: N.E. Connecticut

Posted July 10, 2013 - 07:35 AM

I worked for an Auto Parts store by day and a gas station evenings and weekends. I came across alot of people and was offered a bunch of 307s for free. I was drag racing a 64 Chevelle with a 283. I checked out what everybody was throwing out on the chance that it was an upgrade from my car. It was our machinist that told me about the change in the way the steel was cutting and he was seeing blocks that were warpped. I stuck with my older stuff. Good Luck, Rick


  • hamman and LilysDad have said thanks

#13 hamman OFFLINE  

hamman

    Homelite Owner Extraordinaire

  • Senior Member
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 1733
  • 5,628 Thanks
  • 2,583 posts
  • Location: Michigan

Posted July 10, 2013 - 07:38 AM

Had one nearly like that back in 72. Had a problem with the cam. Soft lobes. GM replaced the engine and it ran for a long time for me. Worst thing I did to it was take it to Earl Schibe in Detroit for a paintjob."..... $99 any cart, any truck any color...." Yup, sure did painted headlights, tail lights, side marker lights, turnsignals, even the rear window. I really liked the truck drove it for work and as my daily driver. Was still running last I knew in the early 90s. Had a lot of rust. Roger.


  • boyscout862 said thank you

#14 boyscout862 OFFLINE  

boyscout862
  • Senior Member
  • Member No: 8923
  • 9,769 Thanks
  • 7,536 posts
  • Location: N.E. Connecticut

Posted July 10, 2013 - 07:52 AM

I've heard of soft cams many times, even on recent B&S Intek engines. Cams are easy enough to change. It used to take most of a day to change the cam on my brothers 69 SS 396 Chevelle. I was dealing with older cars. I'd have been mad if it was a new car. Good Luck, Rick

 

I always did my own painting after my father had an Earl Shibe job done on his Ford. They taped it up okay but didn't clean it to well before painting. The materials cost me less than $50 to paint a car so it would be a weeknd project. I used acrylic lacquer and would wet sand and buff it out after a week.


Edited by boyscout862, July 10, 2013 - 07:57 AM.

  • hamman said thank you

#15 Amigatec OFFLINE  

Amigatec

    Collector of Rusty Junk

  • Senior Member
  • -GTt Supporter-
  • Contributor
  • Member No: 5899
  • 2,023 Thanks
  • 3,172 posts
  • Location: Haskell Oklahoma

Posted July 10, 2013 - 08:25 AM

The 307 was an early attempt at a smog engine. The 327 was soooo much better.!


The 307 came out way before ny smog motor, they were built from 1968 to 1973. They were built to replace the 283.
  • hamman said thank you




Top